Tags
books, C.S. Lewis, christian, christianity, Don't Waste Your Life, God, John Piper, literature, Mere Christianity, quotes
One of the jewels I found browsing around a Christian bookstore in the mid-70s was C.S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity. In one of my very first blog posts, I quoted a line from the book, which, to my surprise, led to a lengthy and rather spirited discussion in the comments. In a subsequent post I expanded the quote to include some of its surrounding context.
In the first chapter of Don’t Waste Your Life, John Piper offers a thoughtful and articulate assessment of Lewis’s impact both on his own life and on Christian thought in general. I could try and try (and try some more) and still never express my gratitude for Lewis nearly as eloquently as Piper does here, although I have a sneaky suspicion that the depth of my gratitude may very well rival his. Piper writes:
Someone introduced me to Lewis my freshman year with the book, Mere Christianity. For the next five or six years I was almost never without a Lewis book near at hand. I think that without his influence I would not have lived my life with as much joy or usefulness as I have. There are reasons for this.
He has made me wary of chronological snobbery. That is, he showed me that newness is no virtue and oldness is no vice. Truth and beauty and goodness are not determined by when they exist. Nothing is inferior for being old, and nothing is valuable for being modern. This has freed me from the tyranny of novelty and opened for me the wisdom of the ages. To this day I get most of my soul-food from centuries ago. I thank God for Lewis’s compelling demonstration of the obvious.
He demonstrated for me and convinced me that rigorous, precise, penetrating logic is not opposed to deep, soul-stirring feeling and vivid, lively—even playful—imagination. He was a “romantic rationalist.” He combined things that almost everybody today assumes are mutually exclusive: rationalism and poetry, cool logic and warm feeling, disciplined prose and free imagination. In shattering these old stereotypes, he freed me to think hard and to write poetry, to argue for the resurrection and compose hymns to Christ, to smash an argument and hug a friend, to demand a definition and use a metaphor.
Lewis gave me an intense sense of the “realness” of things. The preciousness of this is hard to communicate. To wake up in the morning and be aware of the firmness of the mattress, the warmth of the sun’s rays, the sound of the clock ticking, the sheer being of things (“quiddity” as he calls it). He helped me become alive to life. He helped me see what is there in the world—things that, if we didn’t have, we would pay a million dollars to have, but having them, ignore. He made me more alive to beauty. He put my soul on notice that there are daily wonders that will waken worship if I open my eyes. He shook my dozing soul and threw the cold water of reality in my face, so that life and God and heaven and hell broke into my world with glory and horror.
He exposed the sophisticated intellectual opposition to objective being and objective value for the naked folly that it was. The philosophical king of my generation had no clothes on, and the writer of children’s books from Oxford had the courage to say so.
You can’t go on “seeing through” things forever. The whole point of seeing through something is to see something through it. It is good that the window should be transparent, because the street or garden beyond it is opaque. How if you saw through the garden too? It is no use trying to “see through” first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To “see through” all things is the same as not to see. (CSL)
Oh, how much more could be said about the world as C. S. Lewis saw it and the way he spoke. He has his flaws, some of them serious. But I will never cease to thank God for this remarkable man who came onto my path at the perfect moment.
I suppose there’s nothing left for me to say.
My only problem with C.S. Lewis is that he isn’t a Calvinist. Hallelujah to Jesus the Calvinist Messiah!
I’m curious about some things, Marvin. I want to ask you a few questions, and I hope that you engage them seriously. I’m wondering about the last couple of comments that you’ve made on this blog:
1. Do you consider them constructive (edifying)?
2. Do you consider them kind or tender-hearted?
3. Are they examples of speaking the truth in love?
4. Are they intended to contribute to the topic of the post?
5. Are you hoping to get some kind of reaction to them?
6. What reaction are you hoping for, and why?
I would appreciate sincere answers. Thank you.
I’m just proclaiming the same truth as my hero, John MacArthur – Jesus is a Calvinist! I love Jesus the Calvinist Messiah!
“Jesus was a Calvinist” sounds rather backwards to me…Christ wasn’t Calvin-ist. Instead, Calvin was Christ-ian. Reference the lesser as a follower of the greater.
Making Jesus a follower of Calvinism makes Jesus also a proponent of errors in Calvinist theology (and there certainly must be some, or else we claim there are a set of men who are without error in their theology).
I appreciate what you’re saying, Daniel. How come MacArthur never thought of that? I didn’t know Calvinism had any errors – MacArthur keeps talking like the TULIP and premillenialism are absolute truth in regards to doctrine. Perhaps I will refrain from following MacArthur so blindly.
Marvin, I still have to ask you if you believe that you’re speaking the truth in love. Are you attempting to engage in constructive dialog, or just trying to make a point with sarcasm? Again, those are sincere questions on my part, and I would appreciate honest answers. Thank you.
My honest answer, Barry, is that I’m considering whether or not MacArthur was in error in calling Jesus a Calvinist. I just wanted to be what Jesus was. So, since you and a couple of brothers on this thread have given some things to think about, I’ll have to reconsider whether or not my words have been wise. I wasn’t attmepting to speak destructively, but rather constructively. If, in any case, you believe I have not, then please accept my apology. When I come to terms with these issues, I will apologize specifically and quickly for the wrongs I have committed.
Praise be to Jesus the Messiah!
Marvin, I appreciate your honesty, accept your apology, and praise Christ right alongside you. I do ask you to please be gracious and refrain from what appears to me to be sarcastic language (please correct me if I’m wrong) in future comments. Thank you, brother.
I suggest you do refrain from following any man blindly, save for Christ. Every single other man since time began has had errors in his theology.
Marvin,
I’m not so sure I would say “Jesus is a Calvinist.” Calvinism is derived from the teachings of Christ, and it probably serves as human history’s most accurate attempt to interpret and systematize them. But all Calvinism is not the same, and Jesus Christ does not take His cues from any creature. It’s the other way around. John Calvin follows Christ, and not vice versa.
In my view, Calvinism gives us the closest approximation of Jesus Christ’s own theology. But no theological system is perfect. The theology of Jesus Christ IS perfect. I’ll go even further so you can understand why it’s not necessarily accurate to call Christ a Calvinist.
I would compare Christ’s theology with Calvin’s in this way: we can think of Christ’s theology as a perfect 3-dimensional scale model of reality, and Calvin’s as a black and white photo copy of this scale model.
The two are very similar, and have most of the same features. But Calvin’s is missing some things: color, for one, and 3-dimensionality for another. The fact that Calvin admitted as much is one of the factors that eventually won me over to his view.
Granted, the main features are present in both theologies: God’s absolute sovereignty, the pervasive depravity of fallen man, man’s culpability and responsibility before God, divine election, an effective and necessary atonement, the requirement of faith, God’s gracious power to overcome human resistance, God’s sure plan to accomplish all He intends and to finish all He begins – among many other things. But Calvin’s photo copy doesn’t include all the little details. No one’s theology does, but I’ve never found a better approach than Calvin’s. Others believe they have found a better approach, and that’s okay. I respectfully disagree with them.
So, whether you are being facetious, sarcastic, or serious – in my view your statement is neither accurate nor helpful. And whether or not you are a Calvinist, I do very much hope you are a believer in Christ Jesus our Lord. And I hope you realize that your theology – whatever it is – isn’t perfect. But He is.
I too thank God for C.S. Lewis. His ability to be honest about his feelings, yet awe-struck by God’s connection, has really ministered to me at various times and in numerous ways. It’s genius to put “Mere” and “Christianity” together in a title to begin with, but his explanations are so clear and he does create a thirst for more knowledge and a real walk with the Lord. One of my favorites is “The Screwtape Letters.” Realistic fantasy.
Thom
“Mere Christianity” stirred and fired my imagination, Thom, in a way that no “mere” book ever had. And as you put it, it created in me a “thirst for more knowledge” of God Himself. It was one of two books that had a profound impact on me as a new believer. (J.I. Packer’s “Knowing God” was the other.)
God brought the writings of Lewis into my life at a particular time when I was in dire need of well-reasoned faith.
Remembering Lewis refreshed a heart of thankfulness to the sovereign God.
Been a while since I’ve been over here at the blog. I hope all is well with you.
Hey, Daniel. Good to hear from you. I know you’ve been pretty busy. I saw your posts on the DG Conference over at Demian’s blog. I wish I could have been there with you! I went to the very first National Conference in 2003 (on Jonathan Edwards), and it was excellent.
I now need to confess my sin of more-than-mild jealousy.
A conference on Edwards…I bet that was rich.
My statements are edifying because the truth sets people free (John 8:32). My statements may not be interpreted by all to be kind or loving, but I speak with no malice or ill will; I’m simply proclaiming the theological persuasion of our Calvinist Messiah. I intend no reaction OTHER than a consideration by the reader to acknowledge Christ’s doctrine of Calvinistic systematic theology.
In an age when American Christians are fickle and spiritually immature due to decisional regeneration and open-theistic Arminian theology, we need to plant seeds of truth as often as possible.
Thanks for your interest, Bro. Barry. I always enjoy your posts and appreciate the opportunity to comment from time to time!
Praise be to Jesus, our Calvinist Messiah!
I have to be honest, Marvin, I’m still not sure whether you’re being serious or have your tongue in your cheek, but I’m certainly willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I will say that the reaction you say you intend is probably not the reaction you will get from anyone, so it might be beneficial to reconsider your approach.
I also agree with Daniel’s comment below; your terminology seems backward at best and (I would add) possibly very inappropriate. I don’t know how it sounds to other people, but to me it sounds disrespectful toward Christ. He follows no man.
I really like Lewis’s writings. There’s a passage in one of the Space Trilogy books that gives me goosebumps every time: http://ignoranthistorian.com/2007/04/its-a-small-world/ And I think Screwtape Letters is probably the most insightful fiction piece I’ve read. (obviously, I have a penchant for fiction, but it’s writers like Lewis that show us that we can learn a lot from it!)
I enjoy his fiction, too, Ronnica. I’ve read The Chronicles of Narnia three times.
Barry, I’ve come to the conclusion that Jesus did teach Calvinistic theology. However, please excuse the insensitivity with which I proclaimed my beliefs on your blog. I wish you and your readers blessings in Christ.
Marvin, I appreciate the opportunity to work through this with you. It hasn’t been easy for me to know how to respond. I not only excuse any insensitivity you might have shown, I completely forgive it, and consider you my brother. I hope you continue to visit. May the Lord bless you as well.
I consider CS Lewis to be one of the top five influential men in my life. It all started with ‘The Last Battle’ and has grown far beyond his ‘popular’ books. My favorite book by CS Lewis is now ‘Reflections on the Psalms’.
“Reflections on the Psalms” contains some of the most astute observations about the nature of praise that I’ve ever read. Thanks for visiting and commenting, Jeffrey.
Barry,
I found you through the Rabbit Room “Hey! Where You At?” … we’re both from Missouri. This post caught my attention because I had just written my own personal thanks to C.S. Lewis on my blog.
http://epictales.org/blog/robertblog.php?title=my_personal_thanks_to_c_s_lewis&more=1
My story is different from yours, however, in that C.S. Lewis had a strangely indirect role in bringing me to Christ. What I didn’t say in my post, however, is that C.S. Lewis’s writings have had a great and wonderfully eye-opening effect on my Christianity since I became a Christian. As have John Piper’s teachings.
Thanks for the post!
-Robert
Hi, Robert. Welcome to the blog, and thanks for the link to your tribute to Lewis! I look forward to reading it, and to browsing around your blog as well. Have a great day!